2009-11-05T05:28:25-05:00 2009-08-05T01:39:37-04:00 82 2009-01-28T13:04:28-05:00 Was playing around with this creative commons image i saw. Just added the drips for drama haha.. Looks like a movie of sorts. Not sure what I will do with this so the artwork could be for sale. One color halftone. 151 13267 34671 The Disappeared 1259 1 2009-04-18 2009-11-08T04:39:37-05:00 3754 http://cache0.emptees.com/images/50820/thedisappeared01.jpg nice. really effective. the guys at nodbod.com would go crazy with the print! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T13:14:10-05:00 352778 3643 2009-01-28T13:14:10-05:00 wow this is amazing 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T13:19:23-05:00 352786 6917 2009-01-28T13:19:23-05:00 really sick dude, i love this one. 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T13:20:28-05:00 352788 8975 2009-01-28T13:20:28-05:00 Thanks folks. Should i submit this somewhere? 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T13:29:44-05:00 352791 1259 2009-01-28T13:29:44-05:00 Genius!! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T13:42:24-05:00 352801 2879 2009-01-28T13:42:24-05:00 Looks awesome man! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T13:53:42-05:00 352813 997 2009-01-28T13:53:42-05:00 Reminds me of a shower. I would wear this. 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T13:57:50-05:00 352817 8810 2009-01-28T13:57:50-05:00 digging the hell out of it! creepy stuff... 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T14:10:24-05:00 352828 10969 2009-01-28T14:10:24-05:00 i logged in to love this and to say 'yes yes yes'. over and out. try adding some red drips- like blurrd or summit. 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T14:38:10-05:00 352856 2802 2009-01-28T14:38:53-05:00 nice, very nice, i was thinking about some kind of design like this. love it !!!! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T14:48:27-05:00 352870 4680 2009-01-28T14:48:27-05:00 i always love your designs but often wonder how they resolve around the back of the shirt 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T15:21:18-05:00 352914 3668 2009-01-28T15:21:18-05:00 <blockquote><cite>godmachine said:</cite> i logged in to love this and to say 'yes yes yes'. over and out. try adding some red drips- like blurrd or summit.</blockquote> Totally, red drips that are faint almost so that you get that mix of blood and water on the shower in a horror movie look. Then submit it somewhere so I can buy it... cause it will get picked. 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T15:35:32-05:00 352942 1140 2009-01-28T15:35:32-05:00 so amazing AJ love it 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T15:49:43-05:00 352969 598 2009-01-28T15:49:43-05:00 raddest idea yet , i love it 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T16:23:03-05:00 352995 7534 2009-01-28T16:23:03-05:00 dope! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T17:05:16-05:00 353036 11492 2009-01-28T17:05:16-05:00 Love it like ym first blankie! I would see if EZ grabs it.. Very cool concept. 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T17:09:10-05:00 353045 5341 2009-01-28T17:09:10-05:00 Let me make this for you. Email me with your contact info. I have some ideas u may like. 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T17:35:56-05:00 353057 11411 2009-01-28T17:35:56-05:00 thats cool. what on the back? 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T17:40:53-05:00 353061 9543 2009-01-28T17:40:53-05:00 damn! When does this get printed? 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T17:44:39-05:00 353064 7515 2009-01-28T17:44:39-05:00 sick idea 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T18:03:47-05:00 353086 4032 2009-01-28T18:03:47-05:00 <blockquote><cite>a killer wombat said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>godmachine said:</cite> i logged in to love this and to say 'yes yes yes'. over and out. try adding some red drips- like blurrd or summit.</blockquote> Totally, red drips that are faint almost so that you get that mix of blood and water on the shower in a horror movie look. Then submit it somewhere so I can buy it... cause it will get picked.</blockquote> yowza! added the blurrd as you guys suggested! not sure it could be printed this way though! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T18:14:19-05:00 353095 1259 2009-01-28T18:14:19-05:00 That shit kills hard! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T18:49:35-05:00 353124 4038 2009-01-28T18:49:35-05:00 Damn good idea! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T19:24:34-05:00 353166 8413 2009-01-28T19:24:34-05:00 <blockquote><cite>ez-kun said:</cite> nice. really effective. the guys at nodbod.com would go crazy with the print!</blockquote> 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T20:18:07-05:00 353223 2418 2009-01-28T20:18:07-05:00 killer! great! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T21:32:12-05:00 353321 9047 2009-01-28T21:32:12-05:00 email peter@nodbod.com and we will do this up for you as a concept piece very cool. 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T21:33:05-05:00 353322 11411 2009-01-28T21:33:05-05:00 collsion we love this challange 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T21:37:59-05:00 353328 11411 2009-01-28T21:37:59-05:00 this is fucking great!!! 13267 Tee 2009-01-28T23:44:03-05:00 353446 2691 2009-01-28T23:44:03-05:00 reminds me of <img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/giannipoy/whysoserious1.jpg" /> still, nice execution. 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T01:18:19-05:00 353496 10808 2009-01-29T01:18:43-05:00 really awesome! 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T01:30:25-05:00 353502 4661 2009-01-29T01:30:25-05:00 I like it I just wish the red was coming from the hands, looks good though! 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T01:50:49-05:00 353520 5847 2009-01-29T01:50:49-05:00 Man, I wish I could think like you. 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T02:46:05-05:00 353560 2765 2009-01-29T02:46:05-05:00 hey man, you have a brillant idea very nice 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T03:29:23-05:00 353591 11012 2009-01-29T03:29:23-05:00 <blockquote><cite>heythequickness said:</cite> Man, I wish I could think like you.</blockquote> I could, I had this idea a while, anyway nice job =) 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T04:51:44-05:00 353638 3690 2009-01-29T04:51:44-05:00 looks great! 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T05:21:23-05:00 353648 3518 2009-01-29T05:21:23-05:00 love your style! keep up the great work! 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T10:49:53-05:00 353794 10347 2009-01-29T10:49:53-05:00 how would this be printed? 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T12:30:53-05:00 353907 10773 2009-01-29T12:30:53-05:00 this should get tee of teh dayy :) 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T15:38:09-05:00 354114 9658 2009-01-29T15:38:09-05:00 this is so cool 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T17:07:00-05:00 354243 7357 2009-01-29T17:07:00-05:00 Very nice let me know when this goes on sale I have to have one. 13267 Tee 2009-01-29T21:07:53-05:00 354469 10470 2009-01-29T21:07:53-05:00 i like this a lot, creepy 13267 Tee 2009-01-30T00:38:08-05:00 354610 253 2009-01-30T00:38:08-05:00 i love this so much! i wish i could buy it.... 13267 Tee 2009-01-30T01:22:33-05:00 354641 9857 2009-01-30T01:22:33-05:00 this is so great. DBH perhaps? kinda dark for them but this is sooo good 13267 Tee 2009-01-30T13:40:24-05:00 355083 1498 2009-01-30T13:40:24-05:00 reminds me of http://freelanceswitch.com/freelance-writing/working-in-the-shadows-ghostwriting-freelancing-and-work-without-recognition/ <img src="http://freelanceswitch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ghost.jpg" /> 13267 Tee 2009-02-03T23:58:19-05:00 359559 10022 2009-02-03T23:58:19-05:00 ..just used some filters and colouring. 13267 Tee 2009-02-04T00:43:20-05:00 359599 10022 2009-02-04T00:43:20-05:00 yes...filters for sure. 13267 Tee 2009-02-04T00:52:57-05:00 359609 11636 2009-02-04T00:57:14-05:00 i think there is a word for that... mmm oh yeah!! RIP OFF! wait no there is a better one!! OWNED! and LOL! too 13267 Tee 2009-02-04T01:55:42-05:00 359648 3388 2009-02-04T01:55:42-05:00 <blockquote><cite>electricpoutine said:</cite> reminds me of http://freelanceswitch.com/freelance-writing/working-in-the-shadows-ghostwriting-freelancing-and-work-without-recognition/ <img src="http://freelanceswitch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ghost.jpg" /></blockquote> Well like I said in the description on top it's a CREATIVE COMMONS IMAGE i found. I just didn't post the link. <blockquote><cite>kelly1 said:</cite> yes...filters for sure.</blockquote> <blockquote><cite>electricpoutine said:</cite> ..just used some filters and colouring.</blockquote> Well I can do whatever I want with it because I'm allowed to. http://www.flickr.com/photos/piccadillywilson/212999782/sizes/l/in/set-72157594461850845/ Other people have used it for other designs/illustrations too. <blockquote><cite>AKUTOU said:</cite> i think there is a word for that... mmm oh yeah!! RIP OFF! wait no there is a better one!! OWNED! and LOL! too</blockquote> Before you call me a RIP OFF you dickhead you better fuckin do your research first. It's called CREATIVE COMMONS and it means I can do this to it: You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ So there. Get over it. 13267 Tee 2009-02-04T20:30:58-05:00 360657 1259 2009-02-04T20:30:58-05:00 about time this got totd 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T00:17:21-04:00 465761 7951 2009-04-18T00:17:21-04:00 Congrats AJ. lol@ the newbs trying to be all "pwnt" 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T00:19:53-04:00 465791 997 2009-04-18T00:19:53-04:00 looks great man. 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T00:22:19-04:00 465861 1106 2009-04-18T00:22:19-04:00 dude - awesome. i love it. it reminds me of a photo i saw on deviantart, i cant remember the link or id link it to you. its obviously not the same photo, im not trying to rip on you (especially cause i can read and your image is CC) 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T02:19:36-04:00 466521 11896 2009-04-18T02:19:36-04:00 Wow amazing that something this long-standing got a TOTD. I wonder how the formulas work! Amazing work!!! Said so once, will say it again :) 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T02:23:54-04:00 466531 10580 2009-04-18T02:24:13-04:00 Love it brother! Nice concept, perfect execution. 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T03:27:25-04:00 466731 3175 2009-04-18T03:27:25-04:00 absolutely amazing!:O 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T05:55:08-04:00 467511 13290 2009-04-18T05:55:08-04:00 brilliant, well deserved for tee of the day 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T08:15:45-04:00 467891 13514 2009-04-18T08:15:45-04:00 hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T10:26:03-04:00 468281 4084 2009-04-18T10:26:03-04:00 <blockquote><cite>Mike Friedrich said:</cite> hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike</blockquote> Haha you're not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don't know what they're saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story. As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well. 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T11:41:30-04:00 468661 1259 2009-04-18T11:41:30-04:00 always loved this man... well deserved on the totd 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T12:26:23-04:00 469061 269 2009-04-18T12:26:23-04:00 <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>Mike Friedrich said:</cite> hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike</blockquote> Haha you're not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don't know what they're saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story. As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.</blockquote> I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he's trying to tell you is that it's kind of bogus because you're trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it's CreativeCommons, but it's pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip. Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own. The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission. 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T16:07:46-04:00 471591 7179 2009-04-18T16:13:54-04:00 first off this is gnarly. i dont know why ppl are buggin or ppl having to point out OMG LOOK THEY STOLE THIS IMAGE. this is rad who gives 2 fucks where the image came from or how complex the 'design' is he put his own spin on the piece. and it turned out sweet. =D 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T16:33:28-04:00 471991 12090 2009-04-18T16:33:28-04:00 <blockquote><cite>destroyer said:</cite> first off this is gnarly. i dont know why ppl are buggin or ppl having to point out OMG LOOK THEY STOLE THIS IMAGE. this is rad who gives 2 fucks where the image came from or how complex the 'design' is he put his own spin on the piece. and it turned out sweet. =D</blockquote> I think you'd be pretty mad if someone took your image and sold it as their own. 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T18:45:13-04:00 474181 7179 2009-04-18T18:45:13-04:00 I'd double check the Creative Commons <a href="http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/">terms</a> before selling this (rad has shit-all to do with it Destroyer) but as an exercise I wouldn't sweat it. 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T19:09:08-04:00 474391 2330 2009-04-18T19:09:08-04:00 ppl have stolen my images and ive not sweat it. ppl are retarded and will do whatever it is they please despite what anyone else says. over it. lulz. 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T20:50:15-04:00 475171 12090 2009-04-18T20:50:15-04:00 <blockquote><cite>destroyer said:</cite> ppl have stolen my images and ive not sweat it. ppl are retarded and will do whatever it is they please despite what anyone else says. over it. lulz.</blockquote> agreed. who cares? <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>destroyer said:</cite> first off this is gnarly. i dont know why ppl are buggin or ppl having to point out OMG LOOK THEY STOLE THIS IMAGE. this is rad who gives 2 fucks where the image came from or how complex the 'design' is he put his own spin on the piece. and it turned out sweet. =D</blockquote> I think you'd be pretty mad if someone took your image and sold it as their own.</blockquote> its a stock i believe, meaning you can do whatever you please with it. suck on that. 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T21:06:02-04:00 475421 13245 2009-04-18T21:07:06-04:00 <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>Mike Friedrich said:</cite> hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike</blockquote> Haha you're not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don't know what they're saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story. As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.</blockquote> I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he's trying to tell you is that it's kind of bogus because you're trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it's CreativeCommons, but it's pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip. Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own. The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.</blockquote> Jesus there's no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it's for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it's ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I'm sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn't take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that's the case. As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here's what he said: <i>"Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you've done with the pic. I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit. So, if I'd be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'. Cheers Matt"</i> So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already. 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T22:17:35-04:00 475941 1259 2009-04-18T22:17:35-04:00 seems to be alot of fuckdoodles lurking the site recently. that being said, about time this got totd, love ittttttttttttt 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T23:25:12-04:00 476521 10606 2009-04-18T23:25:12-04:00 <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>destroyer said:</cite> first off this is gnarly. i dont know why ppl are buggin or ppl having to point out OMG LOOK THEY STOLE THIS IMAGE. this is rad who gives 2 fucks where the image came from or how complex the 'design' is he put his own spin on the piece. and it turned out sweet. =D</blockquote> I think you'd be pretty mad if someone took your image and sold it as their own.</blockquote> do you have any idea what Creative Commons means? Good job, CT!! I really dig the design and I'm glad to see it got TOTD!! 13267 Tee 2009-04-18T23:41:25-04:00 476671 11188 2009-04-18T23:41:25-04:00 <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>Mike Friedrich said:</cite> hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike</blockquote> Haha you're not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don't know what they're saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story. As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.</blockquote> I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he's trying to tell you is that it's kind of bogus because you're trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it's CreativeCommons, but it's pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip. Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own. The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.</blockquote> Jesus there's no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it's for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it's ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I'm sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn't take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that's the case. As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here's what he said: <i>"Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you've done with the pic. I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit. So, if I'd be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'. Cheers Matt"</i> So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.</blockquote> There's a word for this....... PWNED! Apparently these people don't know what they are talking about. Good job, duder! 13267 Tee 2009-04-19T14:05:22-04:00 481921 2961 2009-04-19T14:05:22-04:00 <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>Mike Friedrich said:</cite> hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike</blockquote> Haha you're not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don't know what they're saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story. As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.</blockquote> I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he's trying to tell you is that it's kind of bogus because you're trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it's CreativeCommons, but it's pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip. Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own. The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.</blockquote> Jesus there's no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it's for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it's ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I'm sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn't take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that's the case. As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here's what he said: <i>"Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you've done with the pic. I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit. So, if I'd be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'. Cheers Matt"</i> So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.</blockquote> There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth. 13267 Tee 2009-04-19T19:10:13-04:00 484451 7179 2009-04-19T19:11:41-04:00 <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>Mike Friedrich said:</cite> hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike</blockquote> Haha you're not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don't know what they're saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story. As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.</blockquote> I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he's trying to tell you is that it's kind of bogus because you're trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it's CreativeCommons, but it's pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip. Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own. The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.</blockquote> Jesus there's no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it's for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it's ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I'm sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn't take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that's the case. As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here's what he said: <i>"Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you've done with the pic. I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit. So, if I'd be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'. Cheers Matt"</i> So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.</blockquote> There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth.</blockquote> There's no credit because this is not the final product. It's a mockup and noone has printed it. Like he said, the credit is for the final product you dumbass. "Stating the truth"?? You're a fucktard for calling me a thief before knowing the truth. I'm not belittling you any more than you belittled me by accusing me of stealing something I didn't. Anyway, I have nothing to explain to you anymore. Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself. 13267 Tee 2009-04-19T21:31:04-04:00 485141 1259 2009-04-19T21:31:04-04:00 <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>Mike Friedrich said:</cite> hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike</blockquote> Haha you're not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don't know what they're saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story. As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.</blockquote> I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he's trying to tell you is that it's kind of bogus because you're trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it's CreativeCommons, but it's pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip. Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own. The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.</blockquote> Jesus there's no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it's for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it's ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I'm sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn't take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that's the case. As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here's what he said: <i>"Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you've done with the pic. I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit. So, if I'd be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'. Cheers Matt"</i> So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.</blockquote> There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth.</blockquote> There's no credit because this is not the final product. It's a mockup and noone has printed it. Like he said, the credit is for the final product you dumbass. "Stating the truth"?? You're a fucktard for calling me a thief before knowing the truth. I'm not belittling you any more than you belittled me by accusing me of stealing something I didn't. Anyway, I have nothing to explain to you anymore. Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.</blockquote> Alright I'm gonna stop. I've had too much fun. I can't believe such a successful artist can be so rude. Now it's posted on the internet for everybody to read. 13267 Tee 2009-04-20T10:33:44-04:00 490941 7179 2009-04-20T10:36:15-04:00 <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>Mike Friedrich said:</cite> hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike</blockquote> Haha you're not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don't know what they're saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story. As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.</blockquote> I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he's trying to tell you is that it's kind of bogus because you're trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it's CreativeCommons, but it's pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip. Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own. The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.</blockquote> Jesus there's no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it's for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it's ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I'm sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn't take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that's the case. As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here's what he said: <i>"Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you've done with the pic. I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit. So, if I'd be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'. Cheers Matt"</i> So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.</blockquote> There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth.</blockquote> There's no credit because this is not the final product. It's a mockup and noone has printed it. Like he said, the credit is for the final product you dumbass. "Stating the truth"?? You're a fucktard for calling me a thief before knowing the truth. I'm not belittling you any more than you belittled me by accusing me of stealing something I didn't. Anyway, I have nothing to explain to you anymore. Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.</blockquote> Alright I'm gonna stop. I've had too much fun. I can't believe such a successful artist can be so rude. Now it's posted on the internet for everybody to read.</blockquote> Ha! The only rude person here was you. 13267 Tee 2009-04-20T10:40:31-04:00 491011 1259 2009-04-20T10:40:31-04:00 i've got one thing to say after all this... <b>it's peanut butter jelly time, peanut butter jellay! peanut butter jellay!</b> oh yeah, <i>pzn</i>, just quit already. 13267 Tee 2009-04-20T11:52:45-04:00 491681 13245 2009-04-20T11:52:45-04:00 <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>Mike Friedrich said:</cite> hmm, sorry CT but this time, i don't follow the hype arround this design. i always enjoy your artwork, but here i think, there are so much more individually and unique designs at emptees. the main-effect i get is the same like the basis photo. for me it could be much more changed to your individual style. if you decide to call me "dickhead" too, because of this critique, feel free to do. but i think, better a real feedback than a "suckmyballs"-comment. :) chEErs, mike</blockquote> Haha you're not a dickhead dude everyone is entitled to their opinion. Those guys just don't know what they're saying and jump to conclusions without really knowing the whole story. As for the design, the base photo was already pretty cool that there is no need to stylize it further. I think most of us here fail to understand that even simple designs can work pretty well.</blockquote> I think he knows that "simple designs work pretty well". What he's trying to tell you is that it's kind of bogus because you're trying to sell some artwork where the main focus is a picture that you stole. Yeah sure it's CreativeCommons, but it's pretty lame that all you did was change some levels and add a blood drip. Also CreativeCommons says nothing about selling the work as your own. The least you can do is contact the author of the picture and ask him for permission.</blockquote> Jesus there's no stealing photos here you stupid fuck. The point of Creative Commons is that you are distributing your work for other people to use. You just determine whether it's for non-commercial use or not. In this case, it's ok for commercial use. The author gave the rights to his image commercially as long as you give him credit. Yes that means I can use it whatever way I want--photoshop filter it to death, add drips, add a dicknose, etc. and sell it to the highest bidder. I'm sick and tired of people like you who think just because something didn't take 10 hours to make then it must be no good. I mean shit they should take away the TOTD if that's the case. As for contacting the owner of the photo..pleasee...done and done.. In fact, he liked what I did with the photo after I asked him if it was ok to use and sell on t-shirts. Here's what he said: <i>"Thanks for getting in touch - I love what you've done with the pic. I always tag my photos with a CC Attribution License i.e. if you want to use the image it needs a credit. So, if I'd be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the final product you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'. Cheers Matt"</i> So there. I mean seriously guys get the fuck over it already.</blockquote> There was no "credit" given until somebody called you out. No need to belittle me for stating the truth.</blockquote> There's no credit because this is not the final product. It's a mockup and noone has printed it. Like he said, the credit is for the final product you dumbass. "Stating the truth"?? You're a fucktard for calling me a thief before knowing the truth. I'm not belittling you any more than you belittled me by accusing me of stealing something I didn't. Anyway, I have nothing to explain to you anymore. Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.</blockquote> Alright I'm gonna stop. I've had too much fun. I can't believe such a successful artist can be so rude. Now it's posted on the internet for everybody to read.</blockquote> Ha! The only rude person here was you.</blockquote> What I'm trying to get at is that you're SUPPOSE to credit the author of the picture no matter what you decide to do with the photo. You failed to credit them; that's why I lashed out at you, because the base image is actually somebody else's. 13267 Tee 2009-04-20T17:54:03-04:00 497341 7179 2009-04-20T18:02:07-04:00 <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.</blockquote> 13267 Tee 2009-04-20T20:55:18-04:00 501141 1259 2009-04-20T20:55:18-04:00 <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.</blockquote></blockquote> Anything you say is a futile attempt to dodge my point. 13267 Tee 2009-04-20T22:43:58-04:00 502951 7179 2009-04-20T22:43:58-04:00 <blockquote><cite>pzn said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> <blockquote><cite>collisiontheory said:</cite> Anything you say is a futile attempt to redeem yourself.</blockquote></blockquote> Anything you say is a futile attempt to dodge my point.</blockquote> Noone's dodging your point. What part of this didn't you understand?: <i>"..I’d be happy to do whatever you like with it as long as somewhere on the <b>final product</b> you can get in my Flickr name 'piccadillywilson'."</i> In the end, noone is stealing anything (which you baselessly accused me of). And credit will be given when and if the shirt will be produced (the final product)--which the original owner of the photo himself said. Anyway, all I'm saying is that before you accuse anyone of stealing/ripping please know the whole story. 13267 Tee 2009-04-21T00:00:04-04:00 504211 1259 2009-04-21T00:00:04-04:00 Yeah! you loose PZN! hahaha Btw, the shirt is pretty cool! 13267 Tee 2009-05-02T23:27:25-04:00 642331 17771 2009-05-02T23:27:25-04:00 real... cool concept bro..... vote. 13267 Tee 2009-05-14T17:44:10-04:00 787431 3834 2009-05-14T17:44:10-04:00 I contact people who share creative commons photos to ask if I can reference them too. I usually just toss them up on the second monitor and use them as a visual aid. Nothing wrong with that. Or this tee. 13267 Tee 2009-06-02T14:37:32-04:00 1023501 5738 2009-06-02T14:37:32-04:00 nice concept! 13267 Tee 2009-08-05T01:39:33-04:00 1893921 34671 2009-08-05T01:39:33-04:00